Supply Chain Defense
Top 10 OWASP API Vulnerabilities
November 14, 2019 | 4 min read
BlueVoyant
“Life in the SOC” is a Blog Series that shares experiences of the BlueVoyant SOC defending against the current and prevalent attacks encountered by our clients. The blogs discuss successful detection, response and mitigation actions that can improve your defensive capabilities.
In today's world where personal devices become ever more powerful and app-driven, Application Programming Interfaces (API) have become prevalent. An API is a software intermediary that allows two applications to talk to each other. An API is the messenger that delivers a request/ response to and from a provider. APIs are currently used in most modern applications including:- Mobile
- Internet of Things (IoT)
- Business to Business (B2B)
- Serverless
- Cloud
- Single Page Application
API 1 | Broken Object Level Authorization | APIs tend to expose endpoints that handle object identifiers, creating a wide attack surface Level Access Control issue. Object-level authorization checks should be considered in every function that accesses a data source using input from the user. |
API 2 | Broken Authentication | Authentication mechanisms are often implemented incorrectly, allowing attackers to compromise authentication tokens or to exploit implementation flaws to assume other users' identities temporarily or permanently. Compromising system's ability to identify the client/user, compromises API security overall. |
API 3 | Excessive Data Exposure | Looking forward to generic implementations, developers tend to expose all object properties without considering their individual sensitivity, relying on clients to perform the data filtering before displaying it to the user. Without controlling the client's state, servers receive more-and-more filters which can be abused to gain access to sensitive data. |
API 4 | Lack of Resources & Rate Limiting | Quite often, APIs do not impose any restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be requested by the client/user. Not only can this impact the API server performance, leading to Denial of Service (DoS), but also leaves the door open to authentication flaws such as brute force. |
API 5 | Broken Function Level Authorization | Complex access control policies with different hierarchies, groups, and roles, and an unclear separation between administrative and regular functions, tend to lead to authorization flaws. By exploiting these issues, attackers gain access to other users’ resources and/or administrative functions. |
API 6 | Mass Assignment | Binding client provided data (e.g., JSON) to data models, without proper properties filtering based on a whitelist, usually lead to Mass Assignment. Either guessing objects properties, exploring other API endpoints, reading the documentation, or providing additional object properties in request payloads, allows attackers to modify object properties they are not supposed to. |
API 7 | Security Misconfiguration | Security misconfiguration is commonly a result of insecure default configurations, incomplete or ad-hoc configurations, open cloud storage, misconfigured HTTP headers, unnecessary HTTP methods, permissive Cross-Origin resource sharing (CORS), and verbose error messages containing sensitive information. |
API 8 | Injection | Injection flaws, such as SQL, NoSQL, Command Injection, etc. occur when untrusted data is sent to an interpreter as part of a command or query. The attacker's malicious data can trick the interpreter into executing unintended commands or accessing data without proper authorization. |
API 9 | Improper Assets Management | APIs tend to expose more endpoints than traditional web applications, making proper and updated documentation highly important. Proper hosts and deployed API versions inventory also play an important role to mitigate issues such as deprecated API versions and exposed debug endpoints. |
API 10 | Insufficient Logging & Monitoring | Insufficient logging and monitoring, coupled with missing or ineffective integration with incident response, allows attackers to further attack systems, maintain persistence, pivot to more systems to tamper with, extract, or destroy data. Most breach studies demonstrate the time to detect a breach is over 200 days, typically detected by external parties rather than internal processes or monitoring. |
Related Reading
Digital Risk Protection
Breakdown of Takedown: An Overview of Tackling Phishing Threats
November 25, 2024 | 5 min read
Microsoft
Scary Cybersecurity Stories to Tell in the Dark: Tales from the Digital Depths
October 22, 2024 | 1 min read